On November 11, 2022, USEPA proposed an update to its November 2021 proposal rules under the New Source Performance Standards for Oil and Gas Sources as part of the Biden-Harris Administration Methane Action Plan.
The supplemental proposal aims to achieve more comprehensive emissions reductions from oil and natural gas facilities by improving standards and adding proposed requirements for sources not previously covered by the rules. The proposal also provides additional clarity to states that must develop plans to reduce methane emissions from existing sources, and for tribal nations that choose to develop their own plans.
USEPA is proposing to strengthen requirements from its November 2021 proposal including:
Oil and natural gas sources that were subject to previous NSPS would become subject to existing source standards under state plans. The table below shows which rule applies based on a source’s construction date:
Construction, reconstruction or modification date | Which rule applies? |
After 8/23/11 and on or before 9/18/15 | NSPS Subpart OOOO issued in 2012* |
After 9/18/15 and on or before 11/15/21 | NSPS Subpart OOOOa issued in 2016* |
After 11/15/21 | NSPS Subpart OOOOb will be finalized in 2023 |
*Existing sources built on or before November 15, 2021 will become subject to state plans under the emissions guidelines once they take effect. |
The supplemental proposal will apply retroactively to any existing operating facility constructed on or before the rule promulgation date including those currently regulated under Subpart OOOO or OOOOa by requiring states to meet the emission guidelines established in this regulation in the development of State Implementation Plans.
Source type | Proposed requirement | November 2021 proposal | Implications |
Fugitive emissions: well sites and centralized production facility1 |
Bimonthly or quarterly audible, visual, or olfactory (AVO) inspections Quarterly optical gas imaging (OGI) surveys |
Quarterly OGI for sites > 8 tpy of methane Semiannual OGI for sites > 3 tpy of methane |
The monitoring threshold proposed in November 2021 (> 3 TPY of methane) has been removed, and the supplemental proposal includes a new approach that would ensure every well site, regardless of size, is regularly inspected for leaks |
Fugitive emissions: compressor stations1 |
Monthly AVO inspections Quarterly OGI surveys |
-- |
Compressor stations will now have to conduct monthly AVO inspections and increase the frequency of OGI surveys |
Well closures |
Submit a well closure plan Conduct monitoring based on type of well site (i.e., single wellhead-only, small well sites) |
-- |
Monitoring will need to be conducted based on type of well site, which could include AVO/OGI, until all wells are plugged, equipment removed, and no fugitive emissions are present |
Fugitive emissions: super emitter response program2 (events > 220.5 pounds of met | Root cause analysis and corrective action following notification of a super-emitter emissions event | -- |
Root cause analysis would need to be submitted within 5 days of notification |
Well liquids unloading3 | Zero methane and VOC emissions / best management practices | Zero methane emissions / best management practices |
The rule is not specific to the technology/best management practices, and the burden is on the operator to demonstrate that zero emission technology is not feasible Supplemental proposal also includes reporting requirements |
Reciprocating compressors | Rod packing replacement | No changes | Rod packing will be replaced based on monitored leak rate (2 scfm) as opposed to at scheduled intervals |
Pneumatic pumps at natural gas plants, well sites, compressor stations, and centralized production facility | Zero emissions (methane and VOC) pumps that are not powered by natural gas4 | Only included natural gas plant | This is more stringent than current requirements to control by 95% |
Pneumatic controllers at natural gas plants, well sites, compressor stations, and centralized production facility | Zero emissions (methane and VOC) controllers5 | Zero emissions (methane) controllers | This is more stringent than current requirements to control by 95% |
Flares and combustion control devices |
Demonstrate 95% control efficiency through a performance test or manufacturer’s performance test Continuous pilot flame or CPMS Monthly Method 22 Net heating value of gas sent to flare or combustor Flow of gas sent to flare or combustor |
-- |
Uncertified flares or combustion control devices will require a performance test for any affected facility Additional monitoring requirements being proposed to ensure flares and enclosed combustion devices operate properly |
Associated gas from oil wells | Route to sales or beneficial uses / control device | No changes | Associated gas must be recovered for sale or beneficial uses and can only be routed to flare (95% control) if recovery is technically infeasible |
Storage tanks | -- | No changes | -- |
1Supplemental proposal provides a pathway to use a broader range of innovative and continuous technologies in lieu of OGI or Method 21. 2Supplemental proposal created the Super Emitter Response Program, which includes large emissions events often caused by malfunctions or abnormal operating conditions (i.e., unlit flares and open thief hatches on storage tanks). 3Supplemental proposal no longer considers all liquids unloading at existing wells to be a modification. 4Sites that do not have access to electricity would be allowed to use natural gas driven pneumatic pumps, but would have to demonstrate that it’s not technically feasible. Emissions from these pneumatic pumps would either have to be routed to a process on site or controlled. 5Supplemental proposal includes two types of pneumatic controllers previously not included: controllers where emissions are routed to a sales line, used for onsite fuel or another useful propose, and self-contained controllers. These controllers, if properly maintained, could be used to meet the zero emissions standard. |
USEPA is soliciting comments on the entire supplemental proposal. Comments will be accepted for 60 days after the proposal is published in the Federal Register. USEPA will also hold a virtual public hearing beginning 21 days after publication.